Nobility and directory

Nobility of Germany

History and Register of the Nobility of Germany

Jurisdiction
Germany
Entry type
Directory
Editorial status
Reviewed - Verified
Thumbnail for version as of 18:56, 13 May 2011

Nobility of the World

Volume VIII – Germany

german-wappen.gif

The History and Register
of The Nobility of Germany

The German nobility (German: Adel) was the elite hereditary ruling class or aristocratic class in the Holy Roman Empire and what is now Germany. In Germany, nobility and titles pertaining to it were bestowed on a person by higher sovereigns and then passed down through legitimate children of a nobleman. Alternatively, unlike men, women could legally become members of nobility by marrying a noble, although they could not pass it on. Nobility and titles (except for most reigning titles) were always inherited equally by all legitimate descendants of a nobleman.

The German nobility as a legally defined class was abolished on August 11, 1919 with the Weimar Constitution, under which all Germans were made equal before the law, and the legal rights and privileges due to nobility ceased to exist. The German nobility continues to play an important role in the various European nations that have not abolished the nobility. Most of the European royal families are descendants of the German nobility. Most famously, close family relations exist between England’s House of Windsor and the Prussian Hohenzollern family, of which the last German emperor Wilhelm II. was a member.

Most, but not all, surnames of the German nobility were preceded by or at least contained the preposition von, meaning of, and sometimes by zu, which is usually translated as of when used alone or as in, at, or to. The two were occasionally combined into von und zu, meaning of and at approximately. In general, the “von” form indicates the place the family originated, while the “zu” form indicates that they are currently in possession of a certain place, therefore ”von und zu” indicates a family still in possession of their original feudal holding or residence. Other forms also exist as combinations with the definitive article: e.g. “von der” or von dem → “vom” (“of the”), zu der → “zur” or zu dem → “zum” (“of the”, “in the”, “at the”). An example is Count Kasimir von der Recke.

holy-roman-empire.JPG

Heraldic arms of the Holy Roman Empire

Siebmachers Wappenbuch

Although nobility as a class of privileged status has been abolished in Germany, nobles were allowed to keep their titles, a provision which is still in place today. Unlike before the Weimar Constitution, however, they have become part of a person’s legal surname. Accordingly, the aforementioned Count Kasimir von der Recke would today legally be called Kasimir Count von der Recke.

Like nobles elsewhere, German nobles were acutely aware of and proud of their superior social position, and often had disdain for commoners. As shown in Theodor Fontane’s novel Effi Briest, they referred to one another as Geborene, or “those who have been born”, while commoners were called Geworfene, corresponding roughly to “whelped”, “calved”, or “foaled” in English, and properly referring only to non-human birth.

Many different states within Imperial Germany had sometimes very strict laws concerning conduct, lineage, and marriage of nobles. Failure to obey these provisions often resulted in Adelsverlust, or loss of the status of nobility. Until about the early 19th century, for example, it was commonly forbidden for nobles to marry people “of low birth”, i.e. commoners. Some states exercised the punishment of Adelsverlust also on nobles sentenced to prison or convicted of serious felonies, on persons engaging in “lowly labor”, or for otherwise grave and unbecoming misconduct. This punisment only affected individuals, not a noble family in its entirety.

Although nobility in its legal significance was abolished in 1919, various different German organizations perpetuate the noble heritage to this day, and for example decide on matters of lineage as well as chronicling the history of noble families. German noble families were almost always armigerous, entitled to bear a coat of arms.

crown-of-prussia.jpg

The Divisions of German Nobility

Uradel (ancient nobility): Nobility that dates back to at least the 1500s, and originates from leadership positions during the Migration Period. This contrasts with:

Briefadel (patent nobility): Nobility by letters patent. The first known such document is from September 30, 1360 for Wyker Frosch in Mainz.

Hochadel (high nobility): Nobility that was sovereign or had a high degree of sovereignty. This contrasts with:

Niederer Adel (lower nobility): Nobility that had a lower degree of sovereignty.

letter-of-nobility.jpg

The Titles and Ranks of German Nobility

  • These titles were at one time used by various rulers. The titles Archduke, Duke, Prince, Margrave (and all other -graves), Count, Count Palatine and Lord were also used by non-sovereign members of some of these families or by noble non-reigning families.
  • Title (English) Title (German) Territory (English) Territory (German)
  • Emperor/Empress Kaiser(in) Empire Kaiserreich, Kaisertum
  • King/Queen König(in) Kingdom Königreich
  • Elector/Electress Kurfürst(in) Electorate Kurfürstentum
  • Archduke/Archduchess Erzherzog(in) Archduchy Erzherzogtum
  • Grand Duke/Grand Duchess Großherzog(in) Grand Duchy Großherzogtum
  • Duke/Duchess Herzog(in) Duchy Herzogtum
  • Count(ess) Palatine Pfalzgraf/Pfalzgräfin County Palatine Pfalzgrafschaft
  • Margrave/Margravine Markgraf/Markgräfin Margraviate, March Markgrafschaft
  • Landgrave/Landgravine Landgraf/Landgräfin Landgraviate Landgrafschaft
  • Burgrave/Burgravine Burggraf/Burggräfin Burgraviate Burggrafschaft
  • Prince(ss) Fürst(in) Principality Fürstentum
  • Count(ess) of the Empire Reichsgraf*/Reichsgräfin County Grafschaft
  • Altgrave/Altgravine Altgraf/Altgräfin Altgraviate Altgrafschaft
  • Baron(ess) Freiherr/Freifrau/Freiin* (Allodial) Barony Freiherrschaft
  • Lord Herr Lordship Herrschaft
  • Knight Reichsritter*
gemany-nobility-document.jpg

The Non-Reigning Titles of Germany

  • Titles for junior members of Sovereign Families and for Non-Sovereign Families
  • Title (English) Title (German)
  • Crown Prince(ss) Kronprinz(essin)
  • Archduke/Archduchess Erzherzog(in)
  • Prince(ss) Prinz(essin)
  • Duke/Duchess Herzog(in)
  • Prince(ss) Fürst(in)
  • Margrave/Margravine Markgraf/Markgräfin
  • Landgrave/Landgravine Landgraf/Landgräfin
  • Count(ess) Palatine Pfalzgraf/Pfalzgräfin
  • Burgrave/Burgravine Burggraf/Burggräfin
  • Altgrave/Altgravine Altgraf/Altgräfin
  • Count(ess) of the Empire Reichsgraf/Reichsgräfin
  • Baron(ess) of the Empire Reichsfreiherr/Reichsfreifrau/Reichsfreiin
  • Count(ess) Graf/Gräfin
  • Baron(ess) Freiherr/Freifrau/Freiin
  • Lord / Noble Lord Herr /Edler Herr
  • Knight (grouped with untitled nobles) Ritter
  • Noble (Von Halffter) Edler/Edle
  • Young Lord (grouped with untitled nobles) Junker
  • The heirs to some nobles or sovereigns had special titles of their own prefixed by Erb-, meaning Hereditary. For instance, the heir to a Grand Duke is titled Erbgroßherzog, meaning Hereditary Grand Duke. A sovereign duke’s heir might be titled ErbherzogErbprinz (Hereditary Duke, Hereditary Prince) and a prince’s heir might be titled Erbprinz or Erbgraf (Hereditary Prince, Hereditary Count), also Erbherr. The prefix distinguished the heir from similarly-titled junior siblings.
  • Graf is a historical German noble title equal in rank to a count (derived from the Latin Comes, with a history of its own) or a British earl (an Anglo-Saxon title akin to the Viking title Jarl). A derivation ultimately from the Greek verb graphein ‘to write’ may be fanciful: Paul the Deacon wrote in Latin ca 790: “the count of the Bavarians that they call gravio who governed Bauzanum and other strongholds…” (Historia gentis Langobardorum, V.xxxvi); this may be read to make the term a Germanic one, but by then using Latin terms was quite common. Since August 1919, in Germany, Graf and all other titles are considered as a part of the name. The comital title Graf has of course also been used by German-speakers (as official or vernacular language), also in Austria and other Habsburg crown lands (mainly Slavic and Hungary), in Liechtenstein and much of Switzerland.
  • A Graf (Count) ruled over a territory known as a Grafschaft, literally ‘countship’ (also rendered as ‘county’). The comital titles awarded in the Holy Roman Empire often related to the jurisdiction or domain of responsibility and represented special concessions of authority or rank. Only the more important titles remained in use until modern times. Many Counts were titled Graf without any additional qualification.

  • For a list of the titles of the rank of Count etymologically related to Graf (and for other equivalents) see article Count.
Trauttmansdorff-arms.jpg

The List of Nobiliary Titles containing the Term Graf

  • German English Comment/ etymology
  • Markgraf Margrave (only continental) and
  • (younger) Marquess or Marquis Mark: march (border province) + Graf
  • Landgraf Landgrave Land (country) + Graf
  • Reichsgraf Count of the Empire Reich i.e., (the Holy Roman) Empire + Graf
  • Gefürsteter Graf Princely Count German verb for “to make into a Reichsfürst” + Graf
  • Pfalzgraf Count Palatine
  • or Palsgrave (the latter is archaic in English) Pfalz (palatial estate, Palatinate) + Graf
  • Rheingraf Rhinegrave Rhein (river Rhine) + Graf
  • Burggraf Burgrave Burg (castle, burgh) + Graf
  • Altgraf Altgrave Alt (old) + Graf (very rare)
  • Freigraf Free Count Frei = free (allodial?) + Graf; both a feudal title of comital rank and a more technical office
  • Wildgraf Wildgrave Wild (game or wilderness) + Graf
  • Raugraf Raugrave Rau (raw, uninhabited, wilderness) + Graf
  • Vizegraf Viscount Vize = vice- (substitute) + Graf
  • The Title of Reichsgraf, Gefürsteter Graf
  • A Reichsgraf was a nobleman whose title of count was conferred or confirmed by the Holy Roman Emperor, and literally meant “count of the (Holy Roman) Empire”. Since the feudal era any count whose territory lay within the Empire, was under the immediate jurisdiction of the Emperor, and exercised a shared vote in the Reichstag came to be considered a member of the “upper nobility” (Hochadel) in Germany, along with princes (Fürsten), dukes (Herzöge), electors, and the emperor himself. A count who was not a Reichsgraf was apt to possess only a “mediate” fief (Afterlehen) – he was subject to an immediate prince of the empire, such as a duke or elector.
  • However, the Holy Roman Emperors also occasionally granted the title of Reichsgraf to subjects and foreigners who did not possess and were not granted immediate territories — or, sometimes, any territory at all. Such titles were purely honorific. In English, Reichsgraf is usually translated simply as count and is combined with a territorial suffix (e.g. Count of Holland, Count Reuss, or a surname Count Fugger, Count von Browne. But even after the abolition of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806, the Reichsgrafen retained precedence above other counts in Germany. Those who had been quasi-sovereign until German mediatisation retained, until 1918, status and privileges pertaining to members of reigning dynasties. A gefürsteter Graf (in English, princely count) is a Reichsgraf who has been made Reichsgraf by an act of the king, as opposed to one whose ancestors have held this privilege since the High Middle Ages.
Bentheim-arms.jpg

The Notable Reichsgrafen included:

Castell

Fugger

Henneberg

Leiningen

Nassau-Weilburg

Pappenheim

Tyrol

Stolberg

A complete list of Reichsgrafen as of 1792 can be found in the List of Reichstag participants (1792).

waldburg-arms.jpg

The Title of Landgrave

A Landgraf or Landgrave was a nobleman of comital rank in feudal Germany whose jurisdiction stretched over a sometimes quite considerable territory. The title survived from the times of the Holy Roman Empire. The status of a landgrave was often associated with sovereign rights and decision-making greater than those of a simple Graf (Count), but carried no legal prerogatives.

Landgraf occasionally continued in use as the subsidiary title of such nobility as the Grand Duke of Saxe-Weimar, who functioned as the Landgrave of Thuringia in the first decade of the 20th century; but the title fell into disuse after World War I. The jurisdiction of a landgrave was a Landgrafschaft landgraviate and the wife of a landgrave was a Landgräfin or landgravine. Examples: Landgrave of Thuringia, Landgrave of Hesse (later split in Hesse-Kassel and Hesse-Darmstadt), Landgrave of Leuchtenberg.

The Title of Gefürsteter Landgraf

A combination of Landgraf and Gefürsteter Graf (both above). Example: Leuchtenberg, later a duchy.

The Title of Burgrave / Viscount

A Burggraf, or Burgrave, was a 12th and 13th century military and civil judicial governor of a castle (compare Castellan, Custos, Keeper) of the town it dominated and of its immediate surrounding countryside. His jurisdiction was a Burggrafschaft, burgraviate.

Later the title became ennobled and hereditary with its own domain. Example: Burgrave of Nuremberg. It occupies the same relative rank as titles rendered in purist German by Vizegraf, in Dutch as Burggraaf or in English as Viscou (Latin: Vicecomes), in origin also a deputy of a Count, as the burgrave dwelt usually in a castle or fortified town. Soon many became hereditary and almost-a-Count, ranking just below the ‘full’ Counts, but above a Freiherr (Baron). It was also often used as a courtesy title by the heir to a Graf.

The Titles of Rhinegrave, Wildgrave, Raugrave, Altgrave

Unlike the other comital titles, the titles of Rhinegrave, Wildgrave (Waldgrave), Raugrave, and Altgrave are not generic titles. Instead, each is linked to one specific countship. By rank, these unusually named counts are equivalent to other counts.

“Rhinegrave” (German Rheingraf) was the title of the count of the Rheingau, a county located between Wiesbaden and Lorch on the right bank of the Rhine. Their castle was known as the Rheingrafenstein. After the Rhinegraves inherited the Wildgraviate (see below) and parts of the Countship of Salm, they called themselves Wild- and Rhinegraves of Salm.

When the Nahegau (a countship named after the river Nahe) split into two parts in 1113, the counts of the two parts called themselves Wildgraves and Raugraves, respectively. They were named after the geographic properties of their territories: Wildgrave (Wildgraf), in Latin comes sylvanus, after Wald (“forest”), Raugrave (Raugraf), in Latin comes hirsutus, after the rough (i.e., mountainous) terrain.

The first Raugrave was Count Emich I (died 1172). The dynasty died out in the 18th century. The title was taken over after Elector Palatine Karl Ludwig I purchased the estates, and after 1667 was owned by the children from the Elector’s bigamous (morganatic) second marriage to Karl’s wife, Marie Louise von Degenfeld.

Altgrave (German Altgraf, “old count”) was a title used by the counts of Lower Salm to distinguish themselves from the Wild- and Rhinegraves of Upper Salm, since Lower Salm was the senior branch of the family.

Furthermore, the term -graf occurs in various office titles which did not attain nobiliary status, but were either held as a sinecure by nobleman or courtiers, or by those who remained functional officials, such as the Deichgraf (in a polder management organism).

imperial-parade-berlin.JPG

The German Junker Nobility

A Junker (English pronunciation: /ˈjʊŋkər/ YOONG-kər, German: [ˈjʊŋkɐ]) was a member of the landed nobility of Prussia and eastern Germany. These families were mostly part of the German Uradel (very old feudal nobility) and carried on the colonization and Christianization of the northeastern European territories during the medieval Ostsiedlung. Today “Junker” is often used as an honorific for untitled German nobility. The abbreviation of Junker is Jkr. and is most often placed before the given name and academic titles, for example: Jkr. Heinrich von Hohenberg. The female equivalent Junkfrau (Jkfr.) is used only sporadically. In the past the honorific Jkr. was also used for Barons and Counts.

The Origins of The Junker Nobility

“Junker” in German means “young lord”, and is understood as country squire. It is probably derived from the German words Junger Herr, or Young Lord. As part of the nobility, many Junker families have particles such as “von” or “zu” before their family names. In the Middle Ages, a Junker was simply a lesser noble, often poor and politically insignificant. Martin Luther was given the pseudonym “Junker Jörg” while he lived in Wartburg Castle in 1521. A good number of poor Junkers took up careers as soldiers and mercenaries. Over the centuries, they rose from disreputable captains of mercenary cutthroats to influential commanders and landowners in the 19th century, especially in the Kingdom of Prussia.

The Modern influences

Being the bulwark of Hohenzollern Prussia, the Junkers controlled the Prussian Army, leading in political influence and social status, and owning immense estates, especially in the north-eastern half of Germany (Brandenburg, Mecklenburg, Pomerania, East Prussia, Saxony, Silesia). Their political influence extended from the German Empire of 1871-1918 through the Weimar Republic of 1919-1933. It was said that “if Prussia ruled Germany, the Junkers ruled Prussia, and through it the Empire itself.”

They dominated all the higher civil offices and officer corps. Supporting monarchism and military traditions, they were often reactionary and protectionist; they were often anti-liberal, siding with the conservative monarchist forces during the Revolution of 1848. Their political interests were served by the German Conservative Party in the Reichstag and the extraparliamentary Agrarian League. This political class held tremendous power over the industrial classes and the government. When Chancellor Caprivi reduced the protective duties on imports of grain, these landed magnates demanded and obtained his dismissal; and in 1902, they brought about a restoration of such duties on foodstuffs as would keep the prices of their own products at a high level.

The German statesman Otto von Bismarck was a noted Junker, as were President Paul von Hindenburg and Field Marshal Gerd von Rundstedt. The Beer Hall Putsch of 1923, staged by Adolf Hitler and General Erich Ludendorff was foiled by commander Otto von Lossow of the local Reichswehr, and the Bavarian Prime Minister Gustav von Kahr. Kahr was later murdered in the Night of the Long Knives (the Blood Purge) of June 30, 1934. This series of events, as well as a few others, led Hitler to dislike Junkers in general. However, Hitler mostly ignored the Junkers as a whole during his time in power, taking no action against them and no action in their favour.

As World War II turned against Nazi Germany and Nazi atrocities were revealed, several Junkers in influential positions participated in Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg’s assassination attempt of 20 July 1944. Fifty-eight were executed when the plot failed. During the war and subsequent expulsion of Germans from eastern Europe, the majority of the Junkers were also killed. Only about 15% made it to the Western zone of occupation.

Bodenreform

As landed aristocrats, the Junkers owned most of the arable land in the Prussian and eastern German states. This was in contrast to the Catholic southern States such as Bavaria, Württemberg or Baden, where land was owned by small farms, or the mixed agriculture of the western states like Hesse or Westphalia. This gave the Junkers a virtual monopoly on all agriculture in the German states east of the Elbe river.

After World War II, during the Bodenreform (land reform) in the German Democratic Republic (GDR), all private property exceeding a certain area was nationalised and redistributed to Landwirtschaftliche Produktionsgenossenschaften (agricultural cooperatives). As most of these large estates belonged to Junkers, the government promoted their plans with the slogan “Junkerland in Bauernhand!” (“Junker land into farmers hand”).

After German reunification, some Junkers tried to regain their former estates through civil lawsuits. However, the German courts have upheld the land reforms and rebuffed all claims for compensation. The last decisive case being the unsuccessful lawsuit of Ernst August, Prince of Hanover, in September 2006, where the federal courts decided that the prince had no right to compensation. Other families, however, have quietly purchased or leased back their ancestral homes from the current owners (often the German federal government in its role as trustee).

holy-roman-empire-crown.JPG

The Nobility of The Holy Roman Empire

The Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation, formally became dormant by a decision of the last Emperor, Francis II, on 6 August 1806, had already long ceased to be a major political power even though the prestige of the Imperial title conferred immense status and influence. Indeed, its description as neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire was peculiarly apposite. The Holy Roman, or German Empire as it should better be described, could justly claim to be the successor of the Western Roman Empire despite its later foundation. Although the Eastern Empire of Byzantium, which expired in 1453, had enjoyed an unbroken succession from the time of Constantine the Great, its claim to jurisdiction beyond the boundaries of the western Balkans was never acknowledged.

The Empire of the Germans was founded by Charles the Great (Charlemagne), whose coronation on Christmas Day 800 gave Papal approval to the unification of France, most of modern Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg, and northern Italy under his rule. Although his male line descendants had died out within little more than a century, Charlemagne is the ancestor of every existing Christian European ruling or former ruling dynasty. The only modern survivors of the Empire are the ecclesiastical Princes – the German Archbishops and Bishops – and the Sovereign Princes of Liechtenstein. With the death of Charlemagne no ruler until Napoleon ever held sway over his lands and the Imperial title became the legacy of the Germans.

The Emperor, although himself usually an hereditary ruler of one or more states within the Empire, was elected to office. Nonetheless, several dynasties managed to perpetuate their grip upon the Imperial title. The surest means of establishing dynastic rule was for the Emperor to insure that his immediate heir was the inevitable choice of the “Electors” by having him nominated King of the Romans in his own lifetime. Those Princes who, by the early thirteenth century, had established their claim to the title of Electors of the Empire were the Prince Archbishops of Köln (Archchancellor of Italy), Trier (Archchancellor of Gaul) and Mainz (Archchancellor of Germany), the King of Bohemia (Imperial Cup Bearer) the Duke of Saxony (Imperial Marshal), the Count Palatine of the Rhine (Imperial Seneschal), and the MarkGraf (Margrave in English) of Brandenburg. Their number was formerly codified in an Imperial Bull of 1356 issued by the Emperor Karl IV (of Luxembourg, King of Bohemia). That this Bull was issued without reference to Papal authority indicates the decline of Papal power since the Avignon schism. Henry IV’s humiliation at Canossa would never be repeated.

imperial-electors.jpg

The Reformation was the greatest blow to Imperial power, resulting in increasing Hohenzollern power with the acquisition of the Duchy of Prussia and the conversion of Church lands into hereditary fiefs. The religious wars of the sixteenth century and the Thirty Years war in the early seventeenth led to a further diminution of Imperial power, even though the Habsburgs’ rule in Bohemia was consolidated. The number of Electors was increased to eight with the elevation of the Wittelsbach Duchy of Bavaria to the status of Electorate (giving that family two Electors, the other being the Elector Palatine) in 1648, following the changes wrought by the Thirty Years war. In 1692 a fourth was added in the person of the Duke of Brunswick-Luneburg-Hannover, who became Elector of Hannover (united with the British crown in 1714). Shortly before the collapse of the Empire, the Emperor Napoleon imposed his own reorganization of the German states and four more princes were added to the ranks of the Electors (three lay Electors, Hesse-Cassel, Baden and Wurtemberg, and one ecclesiastical, the Archbishop of Salzburg – an Austrian Archduke) while the Archbishops of Mainz, Trier and Köln lost their sovereignty and electoral rank.

From 1438 until 1740 the Imperial Crown was held continually by the Habsburgs, who initially did not hold an Electoral seat. The German Electors, however, chose the first Habsburg Emperors because most of their hereditary territories were outside the formal boundaries of the Empire itself. Until the late fifteenth century the Habsburgs still followed the German practice of dividing their territories between sons so Austria, Styria, Carniola, Carinthia and the Tyrol – which were later to compose part of the Empire of Austria – were often ruled by different members of the family. In 1437, Sigismond of Hungary and Bohemia died leaving an only daughter, to be succeeded by his son-in-law Albrecht V (of Habsburg), Duke of Austria. Albrecht was now elected King of the Romans as Albrecht II but died before the coronation which would have allowed him to take the Imperial style. While the Crowns of Bohemia and Hungary passed first to his short-lived son and then to his son-in-law the King of Poland, in 1440 the Electors chose Albrecht’s cousin and successor as ruler of Austria, Frederick V of Styria (first Archduke of Austria in 1458), to be Emperor. The Imperial Crown remained the privilege of the Habsburgs for the next three hundred years.

Frederick was the last Emperor to be crowned by the Pope in Rome and did much to consolidate the Habsburg possessions. His great-grandson, the Emperor Charles V (1500-1558) united in his person the Imperial Crown, the hugely wealthy Duchies of Burgundy and Brabant, the Duchy of Milan, the Kingdoms of Naples and Sicily and the Crown of Spain. The latter’s brother Ferdinand acquired by marriage the Crowns of Hungary and Bohemia in 1526. Unable to rule this vast Empire effectively, Charles abdicated the Crown of Spain, the Italian possessions and the Burgundian inheritance to his only son, Philip II, in 1556, and resigned the Imperial Crown to insure its inheritance by his brother Ferdinand, who was the first Habsburg to combine the Imperial Crowns with those of Austria, Hungary and Bohemia.

The male line of the Habsburgs became extinct with the death of Charles VI in 1740. The senior line, of Kings of Spain, had died out in the male line with the death of the unfortunate King Charles II in 1700 when his Spanish possessions passed to his Bourbon great-nephew. The Spanish Netherlands (originally part of the Burgundian territories) then passed to Austria, while Naples and Sicily were divided, to be temporarily reunited before being reacquired by the Bourbons in 1734. Charles VI left an only daughter, Maria-Teresa, who had been married off to Francis, Duke of Lorraine, founding the Habsburg-Lothringen dynasty which ruled in Austria, Hungary and Bohemia until 1918. Francis surrendered Lorraine (an Imperial fief) to France as the temporary sovereign Duchy of the French King’s father-in-law, the former King of Poland, from whom it passed to France on his death in 1766. After a five year interregnum, during which time the Elector of Bavaria held the Imperial Crown, Francis was elected Emperor. Following his death his eldest son, Joseph II, succeeded as the first Habsburg-Lothringen Emperor

The Empire included not only the territories of the nine Electors, but also more than three hundred small lay and ecclesiastical states whose numbers fluctuated when male lines died out and families merged or divided. These petty rulers enjoyed limited “sovereignty” over states which sometimes included no more than a few villages. Many of the Bishoprics governed small territories which gave them the status of “immediate” [1] Imperial vassals. Some of the larger Abbeys and Convents enjoyed similar status – their superiors composed the largest number of “elected” rulers, both men and women, Europe has ever seen, even though only chosen by their fellow religious brothers or sisters. A smaller number of these “immediate” sovereigns had the right to a seat in the Imperial Diet, a jealously guarded privilege which gave them some say in the legislative and governmental affairs of the Empire and considerable prestige. In the middle of the seventeenth century there were forty-three lay members and thirty-three ecclesiastical members of the Diet but their numbers expanded steadily until the Empire’s collapse. The Diet included the Electors, the rulers of the larger Duchies such as Wurtemberg, and Oldenburg, the smaller Saxon states and Anhalt, and a larger number of Sovereign Princes and Sovereign Counts. Some of the ecclesiastical rulers enjoyed the status of Princes, others only that of Counts and were ranked accordingly. The High Master of the Teutonic Knights, the Grand Prior of Germany of the Order of Saint John (Malta), and the Master of the Knights of the Johanniter Order also had seats in the Diet, ranking as Princes of the Empire.

The titles of Duke, Prince, Count, Baron, Knight and Noble of the Empire were conferred by Imperial patent. The vast majority of the lower ranks never enjoyed any kind of sovereignty, however, having been elevated on the basis of services to their superior lord, the Emperor himself, or by right of some territory they owned which was itself subject to an immediate Imperial vassal. Most such conferrals were made at the request of the superior lord of the beneficiary – an Elector or Duke perhaps, but the MarkGraf of Brandenburg as King in and then of Prussia was able to confer titles in his own right. Later the Electors of Bavaria conferred titles as did some of the other greater Princes while many of the rulers of smaller states had been invested with the right to confer nobility. Imperial Nobility and titles always passed by male succession, most titles being inherited by all the male descendants and by females until marriage (or religious profession). Noble territories could pass by female succession but use of the corresponding title would have to be confirmed in a new Imperial patent. Imperial authority extended also to the Netherlands and Italy, and some of the higher North Italian titles (particularly that of Prince) and Netherlandish titles were conferred by Imperial grant. The Imperial Viceroys, as rulers of the Netherlands, Milan and Naples and Sicily also conferred titles but these were not Holy Roman Empire titles and their recipients did not rank as Reichsherren, Reichsritter, Reichsfreiherr or Reichsgraf

In 1803-06 the principle states of the Empire were (in alphabetical order): (*= mediatized 1806-15) Anhalt-Dessau (principality, Ducal title assumed 1807) Anhalt-Bernburg (ditto, Duke by Imperial Patent 1806, extinct and inherited by A-B-S) Anhalt-Bernburg-Schaumburg (ditto, inherited Bernburg duchy, extinct 1863) Anhalt-Köthen (ditto, Ducal title assumed 1807, extinct 1847) Anhalt-Zerbst (actually amalgamated with senior line in 1793) (ditto) *Arenberg (Duchy, Sovereign Duke of Dulmen 1803-1810) *Auersperg (Principality, Sovereign Count-Prince of Thengen to 1806, sold to Baden 1811) Austria (Archduchy, then Empire 1804) Baden (Margravate, Grand Duchy in 1806) Bavaria and the Palatinate (the Palatinate was divided between adjacent states, Electorate later King 1805) . seat in Diet, created Princes 1817) *Bentheim-Bentheim und Benthem-Steinfurt (Counts with seat in Diet, created Princes 1817) *Bentinck (Counts, sov lords of Knyphausen u. Varel until 1806, recognised as mediatized 1845) Bohemia (Kingdom of, from 1804 the King was also Emperor of Austria) Brandenburg-Ansbach (Margravate, united with Prussia) Brunswick-Wolfenbuttel (Duchy, extinct 1884, representation passed to Hanover) *Castell-Castell (Counts, created elevated to Princely status1901) *Castell-Rüdenhausen (County, elevated to Princely status1901)

*Colloredo-Mansfeld (Principality) *Croy (Duchy, mediatized as Duke of Dulmen in 1803, later acquired by Arenberg) *Dietrichstein zu Nicolsburg (Principality, 1858 titles passed to Mensdorf-Pouilly, non-mediatised) *Erbach-Fürstenau (County) *Erbach-Erbach (County) *Erbach-Schönburg (County, later elevated to Princely status) *Esterhazy von Galantha (Princes, mediatized as Count-Princes of Edelstetten 1803) *Fugger zu Kirchburg und Weissenhorn (County) *Fugger von Glött (County, later elevated to Princely status) *Fugger von Babenhausen (Principality 1803) *Fulda (Principality, ruled by the Prince of Orange, Duke of Nassau) *Furstenberg-Stulingen (Principality) *Furstenberg (Landgravate, extinct) *Giech (County, extinct 1938) *Harrach zu Rohrau und Thannhausen (County) Hesse (-Kassel) (Electorate 1803) Hesse-Philippsthal (Landgravate) Hesse-Rheinfels-Rothenburg (Landgravate) Hesse-Darmstadt (Landgravate, later Grand Duchy) Hesse-Homburg (Landgravate) *Hohenlohe-Neuenstein (or Oehringen) (Principality) *Hohenlohe-Langenburg (Principality) *Hohenlohe-Ingelfingen (Principality) *Hohenlohe-Kirchberg (Principality) *Hohenlohe-Bartenstein-Bartenstein (Principality) *Hohenlohe-Waldenburg-Schillingsfurst (Principality) *Hohenlohe-Schillingsfurst (Principality, separated 1807) Hohenzollern-Hechingen (Principality) Hohenzollern-Siegmaringen (Principality) (Schleswig-)Holstein-Sonderburg-Augustenburg (Duchy) (Schleswig-)Holstein-Beck (Duchy) (Schleswig-)Holstein-Glucksburg (Duchy, later of Schlesvig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glucksberg) (Schleswig-)Holstein-Oldenburg (Duchy, later Grand Duchy of Oldenburg) *Isenburg-Birstein (Principality) *Isenburg und Budingen zu Philippseich(County, extinct 1920) *Isenburg und Budingen zu Budingen (County, later elevated to Princely status) *Isenburg und Budingen zu Wächtersbach (County, later elevated to Princely status) *Kaunitz-Rietberg (Principality, extinct 1887) *Khevenhuller-Metsch (Principality) *Kinsky (Principality) *Königsegg-Aulendorf (County) *Kuefstein (County) Liechtenstein (Principality) [2]Ligne (Principality, lost Sovereignty in 1803 with sale of Princely-County of Edlestein) *Leiningen-Dachsburg (Principality) *Leiningen-Billigheim (County, extinct 1900) *Leiningen-Neudenau (County, extinct 19..) *Leiningen-Westerburg-Alt-Leiningen (County, extinct 1929) *Leyen und zu Hohengeroldseck (Principality, sovereign until 1815) Lippe-Detmold (Principality) *Lobkowicz (Principality) *Loewenstein-Wertheim-Freudenberg (County, Principality from 1811) *Loewenstein-Wertheim-Rosenburg (Principality) *Looz und Corswarem (Duchy, mediatized as Princes of Rheina-Wolbeck) Luxemburg (Duchy, later Grand Duchy)

Mecklemburg-Schwerin (Duchy, later Grand Duchy) Mecklemburg-Strelitz (Duchy, later Grand Duchy) *Metternich-Winneburg (Principality, immediate 1803) Nassau-Usingen und Saarbruck (Duchy) Nassau-Saarbruck (Duchy) Nassau-Weilburg (Duchy, extinct) Nassau-Diez (Duchy, merged with Weilburg until lost to Prussia 1867, acquired Luxemburg 1890) *Neipperg (County) *Neuwied (Principality, now Wied) *Oettingen-Spielburg (Principality) *Oettingen-Wallerstein (Principality) *Ortenburg (County) *Palm (Principality) *Pappenheim (County) Platen-Hallermund (County and Lordship) *Plettenberg-Wittem zu Mietingen (County, extinct 1813) Prussia (Kingdom) *Pückler-Muskau (Principality, extinct) *Pückler und Limpurg (County, extinct 1892) *Pückler und Limpurg-Sontheim-Gaildorf (County) *Quadt-Wykradt und Isny (County, later elevated to Princely status) *Rechburg und Rothenlöwen (County) *Rechteren-Limpurg-Speckfeld (County) Reuss-Plauen-Graitz (Principality) Reuss-Lobenstein (Principality) *Rosenburg (Orsini and Rosenburg, Principality) *Salm-Salm (Principality)

Mecklemburg-Schwerin (Duchy, later Grand Duchy) Mecklemburg-Strelitz (Duchy, later Grand Duchy) *Metternich-Winneburg (Principality, immediate 1803) Nassau-Usingen und Saarbruck (Duchy) Nassau-Saarbruck (Duchy) Nassau-Weilburg (Duchy, extinct) Nassau-Diez (Duchy, merged with Weilburg until lost to Prussia 1867, acquired Luxemburg 1890) *Neipperg (County) *Neuwied (Principality, now Wied) *Oettingen-Spielburg (Principality) *Oettingen-Wallerstein (Principality) *Ortenburg (County) *Palm (Principality) *Pappenheim (County) Platen-Hallermund (County and Lordship) *Plettenberg-Wittem zu Mietingen (County, extinct 1813) Prussia (Kingdom) *Pückler-Muskau (Principality, extinct) *Pückler und Limpurg (County, extinct 1892) *Pückler und Limpurg-Sontheim-Gaildorf (County) *Quadt-Wykradt und Isny (County, later elevated to Princely status) *Rechburg und Rothenlöwen (County) *Rechteren-Limpurg-Speckfeld (County) Reuss-Plauen-Graitz (Principality) Reuss-Lobenstein (Principality) *Rosenburg (Orsini and Rosenburg, Principality) *Salm-Salm (Principality)

*Sternberg-Manderscheid (County, extinct 1830) *Stolberg-Guedern (Principality, extinct) *Stolberg-Wernigerode (County, later elevated to Princely status) *Stolberg-Stolberg (County, later elevated to Princely status) *Stolberg-Rossla (County, later elevated to Princely status) *Thurn und Taxis (Principality) *Toerring-Jetenbach (County, now Toerring) *Toerring-Gutenzell (County, extinct 1860) *Trauutmansdorf-Weinsburg (Principality) *Waldbott von Bassenheim (County) *Waldburg zu Wolfegg und Waldsee (Principality) *Waldburg zu Zeil und Trauchburg (Principality) *Waldburg zu Zeil und Lustnau-Hohems (County) *Waldburg zu Zeil und Wurzach (Principality) *Waldburg zu Zeil und Capustigall (County) *Waldburg zu Zeil und Pins (County) *Waldeck und Pyrmont (Principality) *Waldeck-Limburg (extinct 1848) *Wallmoden-Gimborn (County, extinct) *Wied(-Runkel) (Principality, extinct) *Windisch-Graetz (did not acquire this status until 1804, Principality) *Wurmbrand-Stuppach (County) *Wurtemburg (Duchy, later Kingdom)

During the years preceding and immediately following the collapse of the Empire there was considerable readjustment of territories between states – mostly to the benefit of the larger states which were consolidated within contiguous borders – and of the titles of their rulers. The Electors of Saxony, Wurtemberg and Bavaria became Kings, as did the Elector of Hannover following the downfall of Napoleon, although as King of Great Britain he already enjoyed the royal style. The Kingdom of Westphalia was created for Jerome Bonaparte after territories seized from Hannover, Brunswick and various ecclesiastical states on the right bank of the Rhine but ceased to exist in 1814 when its lands were redistributed – those on the Rhine being given as a prize to the King of Prussia.

The Duchies of Mecklemburg-Schwerin, Mecklemburg-Strelitz, the Duchy of Oldenburg, the Duchy of Saxe-Weimar, and the Margravate of Baden were elevated to the status of Grand Duchies as was the Landgravate of Hesse-Darmstadt. The Grand Duchy of Berg and Cleves (given first to Murat and his wife Caroline Bonaparte, then Napoleon-Louis, the second son of Hortense de Beauharnais and Louis Bonaparte), the Grand Duchy of Frankfurt (given first to Emmerich de Dalberg and then Eugène de Beauharnais), and the Grand Duchy of Wurzburg (given to the Grand Duke of Tuscany as compensation for the loss of his Italian states) were all created out of former ecclesiastical states or the territories of Napoleon’s enemies. Their territories were redistributed after 1814 and their rulers deposed, while the Grand Duke of Tuscany was restored to Florence. The Duchy of Luxembourg was raised to the status of Grand Duchy and added to the Kingdom of the United Netherlands (until 1890 when it passed to the Duke of Nassau), as were the former Austrian Netherlands, until they gained their independence as the Kingdom of the Belgians in 1830. Some states which survived the initial dissolution of the Empire, notably the Duchy of Arenberg which was actually enlarged after 1806, and the Principality of Leyen, were unable to hold onto sovereignty in 1814, lacking the close family relationships to the sovereigns of the victorious powers whose influence might have enabled them to hold their thrones.

The Imperial nobility enjoys a more elevated status than the nobilities of the German successor states and, indeed, of the Italian states. The descendants of Italian Holy Roman Empire titles have formed an Association to which every male line descendant of someone ennobled by Imperial Patent is entitled to belong. The Principality of Liechtenstein has also claimed to be able to confirm the succession to Imperial titles and has confirmed the right of a Spanish nobleman to be heir to such a title, for purposes of the Spanish law requiring the successor state to confirm that the claimant to a particular title is in fact the heir. Thus there is a remaining jurisdiction, even though no Imperial titles have been conferred since 1806.

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. View more
Cookies settings
Accept
Decline
Privacy & Cookie policy
Privacy & Cookies policy
Cookie name Active

Privacy and Cookie Policy Last updated: 11 August 2026

Neue Gotha respects your privacy and is committed to handling personal data lawfully, fairly, and transparently. This Privacy and Cookie Policy explains who is responsible for personal data, what information we process, why we process it, how long we retain it, who may receive it, and the rights available to individuals under the General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (“GDPR”) and applicable national data-protection and electronic-communications law.

1. Who is responsible for your personal data?

The controller responsible for the processing described in this policy is:

  • Legal name: Neue Gotha Historical Register gUG
  • Trading or project name: Neue Gotha
  • Postal address: Musterstraße 12, 10115 Berlin, Germany
  • Email: editor@neuegotha.de
  • EU/EEA representative: Not applicable (the controller is established in Germany).
  • Data Protection Officer: No Data Protection Officer has been appointed. Privacy enquiries are handled through editor@neuegotha.de.

Questions about this policy or requests concerning personal data may be sent to the email or postal address above.

2. Scope of this policy

This policy applies to personal data processed through https://neuegotha.com, correspondence with the Neue Gotha editorial office, material submitted for editorial consideration, and editorial or archival records concerning identifiable living individuals.

It does not govern independent third-party websites or services linked from this website. Those providers are responsible for their own privacy practices.

3. Personal data we process and why

Processing activity Personal data Purpose Legal basis Retention
Website delivery, logging, and security IP address; date and time of access; requested page or file; referring page; browser, operating-system, and device information; error and security-event data Deliver the website, maintain availability, diagnose faults, prevent abuse, and protect the website and its users Article 6(1)(f) GDPR — our legitimate interests in operating a secure and reliable website. Where processing is required by law, Article 6(1)(c) GDPR may also apply. Routine access and error logs are retained for 14 days. Records isolated for investigation of a suspected security incident may be retained for up to 90 days after the incident is resolved, or longer where required for legal claims.
Editorial correspondence and enquiries Name, contact details, message content, correspondence history, and any documents or other information voluntarily provided Respond to enquiries, assess corrections or submissions, maintain editorial records, and protect legal rights Article 6(1)(f) GDPR — our legitimate interests in conducting editorial work and responding to correspondence; Article 6(1)(b) GDPR where processing is necessary to take steps at an individual’s request before entering into a contract; Article 6(1)(c) GDPR where retention or disclosure is legally required Correspondence is ordinarily retained for 24 months after the matter closes. Material required to document an editorial decision, resolve a dispute, meet a legal obligation, or establish, exercise, or defend a legal claim may be retained for the applicable limitation period.
Editorial, genealogical, and archival records Names; titles and styles; dates and places associated with public or genealogical events; family relationships; jurisdictions, offices, and public roles; images; biographical information; source and citation information; and correspondence relating to accuracy or provenance Research, document, preserve, verify, correct, and publish material concerning dynastic, genealogical, heraldic, and institutional history Article 6(1)(f) GDPR — our legitimate interests and those of readers, researchers, and institutions in maintaining an accurate historical and genealogical reference work, subject to a documented necessity and balancing assessment. Applicable national rules implementing Article 85 GDPR concerning freedom of expression and information may also apply. For as long as the information remains relevant to the legitimate editorial or archival purpose, subject to accuracy review, correction, restriction, erasure, and applicable archiving or legal requirements
Cookie-consent and language preferences Consent choice, language preference, cookie identifiers, and related technical information Remember privacy choices, demonstrate consent where required, and provide the language selected by the visitor Article 6(1)(f) GDPR for strictly necessary preference and consent-management functions; Article 6(1)(a) GDPR for optional storage, access, or associated processing based on consent As stated in the cookie table below
Optional external services IP address, page URL, device and browser information, language choice, and service-interaction data, depending on the provider Provide optional translation, embedded content, analytics, or similar features actually enabled on the website Article 6(1)(a) GDPR — consent. Non-essential services remain disabled until consent is given. As described for each service and by the relevant provider

We do not use personal data for solely automated decisions that produce legal effects or similarly significant effects concerning individuals.

4. Editorial and archival information obtained from other sources

Neue Gotha is an editorial and historical reference project. Some information in the register may concern identifiable living individuals and may not have been collected directly from those individuals.

Depending on the record, information may be obtained from official gazettes and public registers; archives and libraries; published books and scholarly works; institutional publications; reputable news sources; publicly accessible websites; submissions from the individual concerned or their authorised representative; family representatives; and other documented sources.

The categories of information may include the categories listed under “Editorial, genealogical, and archival records” above. The material may be made available to website visitors and may be indexed by search engines. Neue Gotha seeks to use relevant, proportionate, and appropriately sourced information and to distinguish documented fact from uncertainty or editorial interpretation.

Individuals may contact the editorial office to request access, correction, contextualisation, restriction, or erasure. Requests are assessed under the GDPR and applicable national law, taking into account accuracy, source integrity, the public interest, freedom of expression and information, archival considerations, and the rights and freedoms of other people. No provision of this policy removes a right granted by applicable law.

Neue Gotha does not intentionally publish special-category personal data or information concerning criminal convictions about living individuals unless a specific lawful basis and any additional legal condition have been identified and documented.

5. Cookies and similar technologies

Cookies are small text files stored on, or read from, a visitor’s device. Similar technologies may perform comparable functions. Some are strictly necessary for a website or a service expressly requested by the visitor. Others, including many analytics, advertising, social-media, translation, or embedded-content technologies, require prior consent under applicable EU electronic-communications rules.

Neue Gotha does not place or access non-essential cookies, or activate non-essential external services, before valid consent has been given. Visitors may accept or reject optional purposes separately and may withdraw consent at any time by selecting the permanently available “Cookie settings” control. Withdrawing consent does not affect processing that was lawful before withdrawal. Strictly necessary technologies cannot be disabled through the consent tool, but they may be controlled through browser settings where technically possible.

The following table reflects the technologies currently deployed on the website. It is updated whenever a plugin, host, analytics tool, embedded service, or cookie configuration changes.

Name Provider Purpose Category Duration Third-party access
_scc_session Neue Gotha / managed hosting and site-control provider Maintains a short-lived session for website security and site-control functions Strictly necessary Browser session The contracted hosting or site-control provider may access the identifier when providing technical support
_tccl_visit Neue Gotha / managed website-analytics provider Distinguishes a single website visit and reduces duplicate counting within the same session Analytics — disabled until consent 30 minutes Yes; the contracted analytics provider processes the identifier on Neue Gotha’s behalf
_tccl_visitor Neue Gotha / managed website-analytics provider Assigns a pseudonymous visitor identifier used to produce aggregated website-usage statistics Analytics — disabled until consent 12 months Yes; the contracted analytics provider processes the identifier on Neue Gotha’s behalf
googtrans Neue Gotha / Google Translate Stores or applies the visitor’s language selection for the translation feature Functional — disabled until consent 12 months Google may receive technical and service-interaction data when Google Translate is activated
ng_gt_default_applied Neue Gotha / website translation plugin Records whether the website’s default translation setting has been applied Functional — disabled until consent 24 hours No direct vendor access is assumed; Google may receive data if activation causes Google Translate to load
eu_cookies_bar_consent Neue Gotha / locally hosted EU Cookies Bar plugin Stores the visitor’s cookie choices and prevents the banner from being shown unnecessarily Strictly necessary 6 months No, provided the consent plugin remains locally hosted and does not transmit consent records to its developer
wordpress_test_cookie Neue Gotha / WordPress Checks whether the browser supports cookies when an authorised user visits the sign-in page Strictly necessary Browser session No; the cookie is processed by Neue Gotha and its contracted host

Authorised editorial users may receive WordPress authentication, security, or preference cookies when they sign in. wordpress_logged_in_[hash] maintains an authenticated session for up to two weeks when “Remember Me” is selected; wordpress_sec_[hash] protects administrative access for the session; and wp-settings-[user_id] stores an editor’s interface preferences for up to one year. These internal cookies are processed solely for editorial access and site administration.

6. Google Translate, web fonts, and other external content

Where enabled with the visitor’s consent, Neue Gotha may use Google Translate to provide machine-generated translations. Activating the service may cause the visitor’s browser to connect to Google and disclose technical information such as the IP address, requested page URL, browser or device information, and language or service-interaction data. Machine translations may contain errors and do not replace the original editorial text.

Website fonts are hosted locally by Neue Gotha and do not require a connection to Google. Google Translate remains an optional external service that is activated only after the visitor provides consent.

Information about Google’s processing is available in the Google Privacy Policy and Google’s explanation of how it uses information from sites and applications that use its services.

Embedded material from another website may allow that provider to process personal data as if the visitor had visited the provider directly. Non-essential embeds remain blocked until consent is obtained. Each enabled provider is identified in this policy and in the consent interface.

7. Recipients of personal data

Personal data may be disclosed only where necessary to:

  • hosting, content-delivery, backup, website-maintenance, email, security, and consent-management providers acting under contract;
  • translation, analytics, media, or other external-service providers selected by the visitor through the consent interface;
  • professional advisers, insurers, auditors, or other specialists where necessary to protect legal or operational interests;
  • courts, regulators, law-enforcement bodies, or public authorities where disclosure is required or permitted by law; and
  • the public and search engines where personal data form part of a lawfully published editorial or archival record.

8. International data transfers

Some service providers may process personal data outside the European Economic Area. Where the GDPR restricts such a transfer, Neue Gotha relies on an applicable European Commission adequacy decision or appropriate safeguards under Article 46 GDPR, such as the European Commission’s Standard Contractual Clauses, together with supplementary measures where required.

Cloudflare and Google may transfer limited technical information to recipients in the United States. Where the recipient is validly certified, the transfer is based on the European Commission’s adequacy decision for the EU–US Data Privacy Framework. Where that mechanism is unavailable or does not cover a transfer, the relevant provider’s European Commission Standard Contractual Clauses and supplementary technical and organisational measures are used. Information about the applicable safeguards, including how to obtain a copy, may be requested from editor@neuegotha.de.

9. How long we retain personal data

We retain personal data only for as long as necessary for the purposes described in this policy, including security, editorial integrity, source verification, dispute resolution, and compliance with legal obligations. The specific periods or criteria are stated in the processing and cookie tables above.

When a retention period ends, information is deleted or anonymised unless continued retention is required by law, is necessary for legal claims, or is justified by a documented editorial or archival purpose. Encrypted rolling backups are retained for 35 days and are then overwritten automatically, unless a backup has been isolated for incident recovery or a legal hold.

10. Security

Neue Gotha uses appropriate technical and organisational measures designed to protect personal data against accidental or unlawful destruction, loss, alteration, unauthorised disclosure, or access. No method of internet transmission or electronic storage is completely secure, and absolute security cannot be guaranteed.

11. Your data-protection rights

Subject to the conditions and limitations in the GDPR and applicable national law, an individual may have the right to:

  • obtain confirmation as to whether personal data concerning them are processed and request access to those data;
  • request correction of inaccurate or incomplete personal data;
  • request erasure of personal data;
  • request restriction of processing;
  • object, on grounds relating to their particular situation, to processing based on legitimate interests;
  • receive personal data they provided in a structured, commonly used, machine-readable format and transmit those data to another controller where the right to portability applies;
  • withdraw consent at any time, without affecting the lawfulness of processing carried out before withdrawal; and
  • lodge a complaint with a competent data-protection supervisory authority.

To exercise a right, contact editor@neuegotha.de. Please identify the information or record concerned and the nature of the request. We may request information reasonably necessary to verify identity and protect personal data from unauthorised disclosure. Requests are normally answered within one month, subject to any extension permitted by law.

Where a request concerns published editorial or archival content, applicable rights may be limited where necessary and proportionate to reconcile data protection with freedom of expression and information or other rights recognised by law. Each request will be assessed individually.

12. Complaints

We encourage individuals to contact us first so that we can try to resolve a concern. Individuals also have the right to complain to the supervisory authority in the EU or EEA country of their habitual residence, place of work, or the place of the alleged infringement.

For this Berlin-based controller the supervisory authority is the Berliner Beauftragte für Datenschutz und Informationsfreiheit, Alt-Moabit 59–61, 10555 Berlin, Germany; telephone +49 30 13889-0; email mailbox@datenschutz-berlin.de; website https://www.datenschutz-berlin.de/.

13. Children

The website is intended as a general historical and reference resource and is not directed specifically at children. We do not knowingly request personal data directly from children for an online service requiring parental consent. If you believe a child has provided personal data inappropriately, please contact us.

14. Changes to this policy

We may update this policy when our processing activities, service providers, technologies, or legal obligations change. The current version will be published on this page with a revised “Last updated” date. Where required, we will provide additional notice or request renewed consent before introducing a new processing purpose.

Decline All
Save settings Accept All
Cookies settings